Saturday, March 11, 2017
Overzealous Is Your Middle Name Which Makes You Just Like Most Authors
Overzealous Is Your Middle Name Which Makes You Just Like Most Authors
Ah... well, I cant speak for all editors, but if I had the first half of a novel and was really excited about it, I would let the author know that Id love to see the rest when it was done.I submitted three chapters and a synopsis to two editors I met at a very small regional SCBWI event. When I sent the 3 chaps, thinking I had a minimum of 4-6 months wait ahead of me, I was aware my MS still needed a last copyedit and a proofread. When Editor A requested the full MS, only three weeks later, complete with scribbled smiley face on her note to me, I was elated.... and horrified to find my story wasnt as ready as I thought. The second half (at least) had some serious issues which suddenly became glaringly obvious to me now that someone actually wanted to see the full. Im sure I made a complete gaffe of the situation: I sent Editor A the first half of the MS, and explained what had happened, with an assurance I was committed to fixing the issues. Editor A quickly rejected my half MS with a form letter. No real surprises there, I guess, a sharp rap on the knuckles, and a hard lesson learned.
Unless it was about vampires, zombies, or angels. Only manuscripts ready to be sent to the printer can have those in them right now. Damned angels.
At the same time, youre right, you shouldnt be submitting a novel that isnt finished, so Im glad youre taking this as a lesson.
Im wondering whats the best way to handle Editor B: just to send her a letter and withdraw my MS from consideration at this point? I dont want to waste her time. But Im not expecting that she will request the full. And I dont want to come across as Stupidity Exhibit A to someone whom I admire. How is an author, if shes silly enough to be there, expected to handle this kind of situation? Talk about arguing for ones limitations....Let her know that you feel youve noticed a couple problem areas and want to send the manuscript to her once its really as good as you can make it. She should appreciate that. And give her an idea of how soon that might be: a month? A couple months? I dont mean to pressure you, but we like people who have a new book every year or two.
Available link for download
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
One Day I Wrote Her Name Upon the Strand Amoretti LXXV Edmund Spenser
One Day I Wrote Her Name Upon the Strand Amoretti LXXV Edmund Spenser
(Poem #1820) One Day I Wrote Her Name Upon the Strand (Amoretti LXXV) One day I wrote her name upon the strand, But came the waves and washed it away; Again I wrote it with a second hand, But came the tide and made my pains his prey. "Vain man," said she "thou dost in vain assay A mortal thing so to immortalize, For I myself shall like to this decay, And eke my name be wiped out likewise." "Not so," quoth I "let baser things devise To die in dust, but you shall live by fame: My verse your virtues rare shall eternize, And in the heavens write your glorious name; Where, whenas death shall all the world subdue, Our love shall live, and later life renew." |
Note: The Amoretti are a series of eighty nine sonnets Spenser wrote to commemorate his courtship of his second wife, Elizabeth Boyle. A companion piece, 'Epithalamion', honours their wedding. It's hard to believe I've never come across Spenser's Amoretti before, but the fact remains that they are simply not very well represented in anthologies, recommendations, etc. . I have to wonder if their closeness in theme, form, feel and publication date to Shakespeare's more famous sonnets has to some extent led to their being overshadowed and relatively ignored - Palgrave declines to include one, for instance - but for whatever reason, I have managed to live in blissful ignorance of them. Anyway, I've made up for that now, having spent a happy evening reading through the sonnets - not really the recommended way to read them, of course, but I was pleasantly surprised by their variety, all the more impressive considering the short period in which they were written, and by the reasonably consistent quality of the poems. I chose to run today's sonnet because I was drawn by its resemblance to one of my favourites from Shakespeare, "Nor Marble, nor the Gilded Monuments" [Poem #1575], but this is in reality a very different sort of poem, more playful and less self-absorbed than Shakespeare's despite its superficial thematic similarity. (It is also not as good a poem, but then, few could compare to Shakespeare on what was practically his home ground.) The theme, as I have remarked before, is one beloved of poets through the ages, but the anecdotal tone of Spenser's poem lends it a certain extra charm and intimacy. martin [Links] Biography of Spenser: http://www.bartleby.com/65/sp/Spenser.html On the Amoretti: http://www.bartleby.com/213/1207.html An essay on Spenser: http://www.themediadrome.com/content/articles/words_articles/poems_spenser.htm The complete Amoretti: http://www.theotherpages.org/poems/spenser1.html
Available link for download